Running Redhead

Bridge of Flowers 10K

Recent EntriesHomeJoin Fast Running Blog Community!PredictorHealthy RecipesBroaddwg's RacesFind BlogsMileage BoardTop Ten Excuses for Missing a RunTop Ten Training MistakesDiscussion ForumRace Reports Send A Private MessageWeek ViewMonth ViewYear View
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
200920102011201220132014
15% off for Fast Running Blog members at St. George Running Center!

Location:

Easthampton,Ma,USA

Member Since:

May 07, 2009

Gender:

Male

Goal Type:

Boston Qualifier

Running Accomplishments:

Rochester Marathon Sept. 2011 = 3:09:27

Iron Horse Half Marathon June 2011 = 1:30:22

Derrill's Race 5K May 2011 = 18:48

 

Short-Term Running Goals:

1) Break 39 minutes for a 10K

2) Break 6:00/mile pace for a 5K

3) Sub 1:27 for a half marathon

4) Sub 3:06 at Boston

Long-Term Running Goals:

1) Continue running for fitness, relaxation and spiritual renewal

2) Possibly take a shot at three hours in the marathon

Ukraine Can Win With Crowdfunded Drones!
Click to Donate
Miles:This week: 0.00 Month: 0.00 Year: 0.00
Asics Bandito Lifetime Miles: 381.80
DS Racer Lifetime Miles: 412.15
Piranhas Lifetime Miles: 86.22
Blue Asics DS Trainer Feb-13 Lifetime Miles: 64.00
Red Asics 1170 Feb-13 Lifetime Miles: 57.00
Race: Bridge of Flowers 10K (6.2 Miles) 00:43:51, Place overall: 84, Place in age division: 47
Slow milesFast milesTotal Distance
3.006.209.20

So this was my goal race for the summer. I hit the first two miles exactly on pace with 6:40 miles. The wrinkle in the plan was that I had heard about an enormous hill in mile three. Well, I hit the hill in great position, but unfortunately it was every bit as steep as everybody had said. According to my calculations the grade was about 12 percent and it lasted about .8 of a mile. Unfortunately I've been unable to get real hill training in without hills around me or access to a treadmill, so I had to simulate it. In any case, I slowed down dramatically over that mile.

According to the Garmin every mile except the one with the monster hill was at or significantly faster than goal pace. I made up some time on the backside of the hill of course. My strong desire goal was to go under 42 minutes, but I figured I'd be content with a time under 44. So I made the secondary goal. As far as placing, I was well ahead of my goal to finish in the top 100. There were over 600 racers, so my finish put me in the top 15 percent. I met somebody who lives nearby that finished about a minute faster, so maybe I can get somebody to push me in training.

I wonder if somebody could explain something to me though. The course was certified, and my Garmin appeared to be quite accurate, measuring at least 6.2 miles for the total distance. Unfortunately I didn't stop it right at the finish line. However, on the Garmin my average pace was 7:01. The chip time had me at 7:04. And I'm pretty sure the split I heard for two miles was about 20 seconds slower than the Garmin had for two miles. What gives?? It seems like the chip did me no good in making up for the time lost at the start. I want my 20 seconds!

In any case, I'm pretty pleased with the place and quite pleased that I was faster than goal pace for all the miles without monster inclines. I know I would be under 42 and probably close to 41 with a faster course. One person told me that the hill on this course typically adds 2-3 minutes for most people. Factor that in or factor how much time my third mile was above goal pace and I'm pretty close to 41.

I'm now looking forward to a fall half marathon where I'll make it a point to find a flatter course. =) I think I'm better at the longer distances anyway.

Asics Stratus 2.1 Miles: 9.20
Comments
From Kelli on Sun, Aug 09, 2009 at 17:16:32 from 71.219.82.15

You did great! Hills can be tough, especially if you were unable to train for them. I am glad you knew the hill was there so that you were not disappointed by your time!!

Garmins are never spot on! I think they are just more of a tool, not a "bible" if you know what I mean?!? Mine is never right on, ever. At the last half marathon I did, I lost time, too. It was frustrating.

Good luck with your future races and goals!

From Broaddwg on Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 15:23:58 from 24.151.140.18

Thanks Kelli! I know the Garmin shouldn't be considered more accurate than the race results, but it seems like my chip time should be faster than the time on the board when I crossed the finish line. I thought I was about 12 rows and 15 yards back from the start at the gun, but maybe not. =)

From Kelli on Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 17:53:54 from 71.219.82.15

I hear ya, those Garmins just do not make sense sometimes. I had the same disappointment in a half this spring. I really wanted to go by my Garmin time!!! It was 4 seconds faster on my average pace.

Add Your Comment.
  • Keep it family-safe. No vulgar or profane language. To discourage anonymous comments of cowardly nature, your IP address will be logged and posted next to your comment.
  • Do not respond to another person's comment out of context. If he made the original comment on another page/blog entry, go to that entry and respond there.
  • If all you want to do is contact the blogger and your comment is not connected with this entry and has no relevance to others, send a private message instead.
Only registered users with public blogs are allowed to post comments. Log in with your username and password or create an account and set up a blog.
Debt Reduction Calculator
Featured Announcements
Lone Faithfuls
(need a comment):
Recent Comments: