Jeff Necessary
Lurker
Posts: 17
|
|
« Reply #2 on: September 29, 2008, 04:23:09 pm » |
|
The reason I rest on Friday is that five days a week, I run in the evening; on Saturday, I run with a group before dawn. Thus, if I run Friday night and then again Saturday morning, it's only about 10 hours apart, maybe less. I did try the Friday night-Saturday morning combination one week and had a terrible run on Saturday (not just slow, but painful; my muscles just would not loosen up) after only a five-miler on Friday. And because Friday is my toughest work day of the week, physically as well as intellectually, I don't want to change the Friday run to AM and show up at work already fatigued. (I have a good job, and I'd like to keep it.) The Thursday night to Saturday AM span is only about 34 hours. I also get about a 30-something hour break between the Saturday and Sunday runs, and I find that by Sunday evening, I WANT to run to get the kinks out.
I get where you're coming from, though, and I know Hal Higdon advocates the same thing -- doing your long run tired. I think at this point in my training, my legs are tired all the time anyway; it would take a lot more than 48 hours to fully recover. But I agree that doing base mileage instead of Pfitz's tempo/VO2 stuff might let me handle the present mileage better. Doing 8-10 miles five nights, plus the LR on Saturday, will get me into the low to mid-60s as well.
I'm used to hills, really; what got me Saturday was running those hills fast. Many of my long runs are over portions of the Little Rock marathon course, which is considerably hillier than what you're describing.
|