Sasha Pachev
|
|
« Reply #20 on: May 31, 2011, 01:14:13 pm » |
|
The problem that a sub-2:05 marathoner will have in St. George is that at that level the downhill is not as much of an aiding factor over any distance, and in the marathon in particular. Preservation of the quads becomes more important than the extra speed boost from the downhill. In fact, it may very well be that their limiting factor is not leg power so much as the muscle breakdown.
First half in St. George is slower than the second, but it is not that slow. Maybe a minute slower than the first half of TOU. Some data for me: 2003 TOU 1:10:29/1:17:17, STG 1:11:49/1:12:58, 2004 TOU 1:12:50/1:20:01 STG 1:13:05/1:12:14, similar trends in other years. In 2003 I raced 3 sea-level marathons after running STG and TOU, and opened with 1:12:09 (Richmond, VA rather flat), 1:15:?? (something low) Sprintfield, MO (hilly course), and 1:13:30 Huntsville, AL, flat but tired from another marathon a week earlier. In 2007 I opened TOU with 1:10:31, STG with 1:12:09, and then running in Memphis, TN with 1:12:43. I think it is reasonable to say that the first half of St. George is comparable to a flat sea-level half. Which means that you should expect around 1:01-1:02 from a world-record aiming runner on it. Definitely not 1:06. Brandon Rhodes, while in about 2:15 honest course shape, hit somewhere in the range of of 1:06-1:07 on it in 1997. He finished in 2:15 after a blow-up, but that was a blowup not related to speed or potential. So the question is if the sub-2:00 candidate would have the quads to live through a sub-59:00 second half.
I believe with specific downhill training the goal eventually can be reached, and will likely result in eventually breaking 2:00 on a record eligible course due to the removal of the broken muscle tissue limit and the neurological adaptations to be more economical at 4:30 pace. The question is, do you know a millionaire that would like to sponsor the attempt?
|